Contract packagers and contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) need to evaluate equipment against a mix of customer products—not just the next order. Compare Mactec blister, pouch, and filling platforms around package formats, product handling, and the work required between campaigns.
Compare equipment families for your product mix
- Blister packaging machines: compare sealing-only equipment with complete forming, filling, and sealing platforms. Start with the cavity, product-loading method, and lidding material.
- Vertical and horizontal pouch machines: distinguish dosing liquids or powders from placing an individual patch or device. Review the required pouch construction and feeding method.
- Monoblock filling equipment: define the cup, tube, vial, or small bottle, then identify the filling and closing operations needed.
Use the machine overview to compare individual models, then confirm each proposed product and format with Mactec.
Make changeovers part of the selection process
List the formats you expect to run and how often they will change. Ask which tooling, product-contact parts, feeding equipment, and machine settings differ between jobs. Include cleaning, material preparation, and first-package checks when defining the work between campaigns. Do not treat a published cycle rate as a changeover-time estimate.
Look beyond the maximum running rate
Build a representative production schedule using the mix of products and formats you expect to run. Separate time making acceptable packages from time spent preparing materials, cleaning, changing formats and completing required checks. Use your own observed or agreed assumptions rather than a generic changeover estimate.
Ask whether the proposed configuration fits that schedule and staffing plan. If future automation is part of the plan, identify which additions need provision now; do not assume later upgrades are automatic. The automation guide and RFQ checklist help make those assumptions explicit.
Prepare a multi-product application brief
- Representative products, package drawings, materials, and closures.
- Fill quantities, placement requirements, and the operations already completed upstream.
- Expected campaign sizes, format changes, and acceptable finished-output requirements.
- Available floor space, utilities, operator involvement, and downstream handling.
- Customer-specific coding, inspection, acceptance, and documentation requirements.
Questions for contract packagers and CDMOs
Can one platform serve every customer format?
Do not assume universal compatibility. Compare the full product and package list so engineering can identify common requirements, format-specific tooling, and applications that need a different platform.
How should we compare output?
Define acceptable finished packages over the available production period. Include filling, loading, staffing, material changes, and the acceptance conditions for the actual configuration.
What should the proposal make clear?
Separate the base equipment, tooling for each format, feeding or filling components, selected options, and agreed services. Confirm the responsibilities and materials needed for acceptance testing rather than assuming a standard documentation package or trial offer.
Discuss your planned campaigns
Share the products and package formats you expect to run. Mactec can help identify the platforms to evaluate and the application details still needed.
Related guides
- In-house or contract packaging?: Questions to answer before bringing packaging in-house.
- What drives packaging machine cost: The choices that move the price, buying in phases, and what to send for a budgetary quote.
- Working out the machine speed you need: Turn a production target into cycles per minute and compare finished output.
Talk to an engineer